NCAAB Notre Dame at Pittsburgh Totals Dec-31-2016

NCAAB: Notre Dame at Pittsburgh

Combined Team Performance Analysis for Totals

Game Time:2:00 PM

The chart below shows the historical team performance for Pittsburgh and Notre Dame against their respective over under lines.

By analyzing how the teams perform against their over under lines we can gauge the public perception vs actual results .

The most recent results vs OU Lines:
Pittsburgh =UNDER 1 Game(s)
Notre Dame =OVER 1 Game(s)

We search for winning(up) trends, losing (down) trends that provide a sports betting opportunities. Over trends will usually increase the OU Line for future games. Under Trends will usually reduce the OU Line for Future games.

The combined performance of the two teams over the last 20 games has been Over their respective Totals. The 3 game combined trend of team scoring performance vs their lines has been Over.

Check out how the Totals compare here: NCAAB Totals .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:
NCAAB Totals Odds History

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:
NCAAB Scores

Here are the scores combined:

NCAAB Combined Scores

Here is a chart of each team’s opponents:

NCAAB Opponent Scores

CFB Pittsburgh at Virginia Totals Oct-15-2016

NCAAF: Pittsburgh at Virginia

Combined Team Performance Analysis for Totals

Game Time:3:30 PM

The trends below show the historical team performance for Virginia and Pittsburgh against their respective over under lines.

By analyzing how the teams perform against their over under lines we can see how can gauge the public perception vs actual results .

The most recent results vs OU Lines:
Virginia=UNDER 1 Game(s)
Pittsburgh=OVER 6 Game(s)

We search for winning(up) trends, losing (down) trends that provide a sports betting opportunities. Over trends will usually increase the OU Line for future games. Under Trends will usually reduce the OU Line for Future games.

The combined performance of the two teams over the last 20 games has been Over their respective Totals. The 3 game combined trend of team scoring performance vs their lines has been Over.

Check out how the Totals compare here: CFB Totals .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:
College Football Totals Odds History

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:
College Football Scores

Here are the scores combined:

CFB Combined Scores

Here is a chart of each team’s opponents:

CFB Opponent Scores

NCAAF Pittsburgh at Virginia Spread Bet Oct-15-2016

NCAAF: Pittsburgh at Virginia

Team Performance Analysis for Spread Results

Game Time:3:30 PM

We analyze the historical team performance for Virginia and Pittsburgh. The overall team performance trends against their spreads can be used to analyze the current Spread(ATS).

Trends help find the hot and cold teams. “Hot” teams have strength and have been beating their opponents(covering) while cold teams have been weak and losing.

Win-Loss ATS Trends:

Virginia=WON 2
Pittsburgh=LOST 1

We search for winning(up) trends and losing (down) trends that provide sports betting opportunities.

In the last 20 games of historical trend performance of the two teams VIRGNA has been outperforming PITT.

Check out how the Odds compare here: CFB Spread Odds .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:
College Football Spread Bet History

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:
College Football Scores

Here are the scores combined:

CFB Combined Scores

Here is a chart of each team’s opponents:CFB Opponent Scores

CFB Marshall at Pittsburgh Totals Oct-01-2016

NCAAF: Marshall at Pittsburgh

Combined Team Performance Analysis for Totals

Game Time:7:30 PM

The trends below show the historical team performance for Pittsburgh and Marshall against their respective over under lines.

By analyzing how the teams perform against their over under lines we can see how can gauge the public perception vs actual results .

The most recent results vs OU Lines:
Pittsburgh=OVER 3 Game(s)
Marshall=OVER 2 Game(s)

We search for winning(up) trends, losing (down) trends that provide a sports betting opportunities. Over trends will usually increase the OU Line for future games. Under Trends will usually reduce the OU Line for Future games.

The combined performance of the two teams over the last 20 games has been Over their respective Totals. The 3 game combined trend of team scoring performance vs their lines has been Over.

Check out how the Totals compare here: CFB Totals .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:
College Football Totals Odds History

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:
College Football Scores

Here are the scores combined:

CFB Combined Scores

Here is a chart of each team’s opponents:

CFB Opponent Scores

NCAAF Marshall at Pittsburgh Spread Bet Oct-01-2016

NCAAF: Marshall at Pittsburgh

Team Performance Analysis for Spread Results

Game Time:7:30 PM

We analyze the historical team performance for Pittsburgh and Marshall. The overall team performance trends against their spreads can be used to analyze the current Spread(ATS).

Trends help find the hot and cold teams. “Hot” teams have strength and have been beating their opponents(covering) while cold teams have been weak and losing.

Win-Loss ATS Trends:

Pittsburgh=WON 1
Marshall=LOST 2

We search for winning(up) trends and losing (down) trends that provide sports betting opportunities.

In the last 20 games of historical trend performance of the two teams MARSHL has been outperforming PITT.

Check out how the Odds compare here: CFB Spread Odds .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:
College Football Spread Bet History

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:
College Football Scores

Here are the scores combined:

CFB Combined Scores

Here is a chart of each team’s opponents:CFB Opponent Scores

NCAAF Pittsburgh at Oklahoma State Spread Bet Sep-17-2016

NCAAF: Pittsburgh at Oklahoma State

Team Performance Analysis for Spread Results

Game Time:3:30 PM

We analyze the historical team performance for Oklahoma State and Pittsburgh. The overall team performance trends against their spreads can be used to analyze the current Spread(ATS).

Trends help find the hot and cold teams. “Hot” teams have strength and have been beating their opponents(covering) while cold teams have been weak and losing.

Win-Loss ATS Trends:

Oklahoma State=LOST 1
Pittsburgh=LOST 4

We search for winning(up) trends and losing (down) trends that provide sports betting opportunities.

In the last 20 games of historical trend performance of the two teams OKLAST has been outperforming PITT.

Check out how the Odds compare here: CFB Spread Odds .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:
College Football Spread Bet History

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:
College Football Scores

Here are the scores combined:

CFB Combined Scores

Here is a chart of each team’s opponents:CFB Opponent Scores